Factionalism and Checks and Balances System

2). Indeed, Schuler contends that throughout history other new forms of chat uniform radio, TV, and others were get bywed in a standardized manner as the Internet. However, in turn, each of these new forms of communication is wielded and controlled, both in access and content, by powerful, squiffy mathematical groups that control society.

The conflict theory of social problems maintains that social issues like poverty, prejudice, and political disenfranchisement arise from competing interests of different social groups as they vie for resources. The media, aside from the Internet, is currently owned, manipulated, and controlled by a handful of rich interests who perpetuate the values, norms, and beliefs that insure their own interests through the media. FOX news show primarily became a supporter of President Bush in his reelection bid, as opposed to an unbiased source of critical knowledge for voters to help in political decision-making. Schuler (p. 2) warns that those who view the Internet as being able to transcend this process may not recognize the future of the Internet may be kind of similar to other current forms of communications media, "There is a large number of powerful and resource-rich institutions that are banking on the initiative that the Internet will repay their investments handily. We may learn in time that the investments that provide the largest returns to inve

stors tycoon not be the same as those that are the scoop up investments for cultivating civic culture."

Mack, Ann M. "How the Internet is Changing Politics." Adweek, 45(4), Jan 26, 2004, 18-21.

As an example of a professional organization that is devoted to maintaining the potential for body politic of the Internet, Schuler (p. 5-6) provides a discussion of the Seattle Community Network (SCN), an organization whose members and associate organizations maintain: 1) Commitment to access; 2) Commitment to service; 3) Commitment to democracy; 4) Commitment to the world community; and 5) Commitment to the future. Efforts like this canful be enhanced by the collaboration of computer professionals and technologists with local government agencies and community citizens.

It is efforts like these that will be required to prevent the "heroic" status of the Internet with respect to promoting affair and enfolding from turning into another tool of the powerful and selected "status quo."

Such success stories are part of the conclude why Schuler maintains that many viewed the Internet as a crisp hero that will reawaken the principles of democracy and civic participation in American society. Nevertheless, such a view is mistaken by the notion that the Internet is unlike other forms of communications or social institutions, something immune to powerful interest group control. We see Schuler (p. 3) provides us with a definition of "organic intellectuals," an one-on-one that is considered an "expert" in some field or scene of action that is usually hired by an institution, the state, or the private sphere to highlight information pertaining to public issues. As Schuler contends, these individuals act on behalf of the powerful interests that pay them much more than they act on behalf of public interest. Schuler (p. 3) argues that one of the things that will undermine the Internet's potential to farm civic culture will be the manner in which one body of "organic intellectuals," co
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.