Specifying the Relationship Between Arrestee Drug Test Results

Many of the earlier studies cited by the authors clearly did not drop exacting medicate trial run results at the time of arrest as a variable. In discussing the potential value for law enforcement of being able to send for early deplorable behavior on the basis of arbitrary drug streamlet results at the time of arrest, the authors brushed everyplace quite lightly the highly significant progeny of the constitutionality of categorizing, treating, or even punishableizing an individual on the basis of the portent of future behavior on the basis of some quantitative procedure. This issue is of the utmost significance, and is involved in a number of immoral justice policy debates, such as the continued imprisonment sex offender subsequent to the completion of prescribed penal sentences on the basis of a prediction of future behavior. To sluff all over this issue in such a caviler musical mode places the author's credibility in question. In their development of the problem investigated in the study reported in the article, the authors acknowledged the contention that the prediction of future criminal activity on the basis of commanding drug test results at the time of arrest is a needless and costly exercise, as other selective information cognize about arrestees, such as prior criminal history, ar equally good forecasters of future criminal activity. This contention is referred to as

The authors concluded that positive results of drug test uptake at the time of arrest is an right predictor of future criminal activity, and is a better predictor of such activity than is prior criminal history. The conclusion handily ignored the methodological problems with the investigate reported in the article. As noted at an earlier point in this critique, With assess to arrestee drug testing, the authors limited the types of drugs included in the sample data to cocaine, PCP, and opiates. The author's utter that these drugs were included in the sample data because their use was found to be higher among arrestees than were other drugs.

The maximum use among arrestees of other drugs was three portion, according to the author's with modal use levels in the one part to two percentage range. The authors noted than an exclusion to this case was marijuana, for which sevenpercent of the arrestee sample tested positive. The authors stated that marijuana use was excluded from the sample data because past research had not shown marijuana to be related to future criminal behavior. Nevertheless, the authors failed to discuss the fact that fewer of the arrestee sample tested positive for PCP (5.6 percent) than tested positive for marijuana (7.0 percent). The authors, thus, left themselves open up to the charge that they used other than objective criteria in the pickax of sample data, and purposefully excluded data related to arrestee positive testing for marijuana because it would invalidate their predetermined conclusions that positive drug test results at the time of arrest is a valid and original indicator of future criminal behavior.

The Data Used in the Current Research Section of the Article

The authors noted that 52 percent of the members of the sample testing positive for drug use at the time of arrest also had prior criminal records. Overall, 64.2 percent of the sample members had prior criminal records, while only 56.7 percent tested positive
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.