Life support technologies seem to have distorted the line between prolongation of life as opposed to prolongation of the dying process , leading to questions relating to competency of the traditional of death as the cessation of all racy signsWhen are we supposed to say death has occurred during the dying cut Should we go by the traditional definition of death or should we be guided by the new measuring devices upon their undercover work of the cessation of high brain activity (Smedira NG , Evans BH , Grais LS , et al 1990Questions such as whether refusal of life preserving treatment through fake methods is a morally acceptable option or does it sum total to suicide . Is it immoral for doctors , nurses and families to withdraw life-preserving treatments or stop the same once they have begun ? Should such actions be construed the same as `killing patients or there crucial ethical differences to be made between letting go off life through withholding or stopping treatment as opposed to actual killing or causing deathThe unavailability of public and professional compromise on these questions creates moral conflict within the general public , among families and doctors as well as between medical professionals themselvesBased on the above questions should life support patients be allowed to stay on the medicine indefinitelyThe social indebtedness of the doctor is to maintain life and mitigate sufferings . Whenever the doing of one working class clashes with another , the preferences of the patient independency demands that , physicians respect the decision to book up life continuing...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment