Dina Davis believes that genetic testing for late-onset diseases violates the childs rights. First, it disrespects the childs right to make her own decisions. She argues that the decision to come in tested should come from the child, not the parents. She states that this decision isnt easy, and that everyone has diametrical opinions and conclusions. Some people would rather live in uncertainty, piece of music others would rather live in certainty. This is a choice that notify only be made by the individual herself (Davis 99). Second, Davis believes that genetic testing violates the childs privacy.
Having her genetic status know has many disadvantages. It could expose her to discrimination and stigmatization. It could also add difficulties on obtaining employment and insurance. (Davis 105). For Davis, violating both of these rights restrict the childs future.
I would like to extend Davis argument to other rights. It also violates the childs right not to know. Children, and all other people, should have the right not to know their genetic information. They shouldnt be exposed to knowledge that they dont privation, especially when it comes to their health. annihilating information can harm individuals psychologically, and at the same time, it...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment