The Transformed American Policy on Immigration

Tinkering continued in 1965, as President Johnson signed a law that made the reunification of families the primary focus of America's immigration policy. At that time, the government mainly concerned itself with legal immigration (Simpson 153).

That soon changed, not coincidentally as America's economic situation deteriorated. Inside 1970s, the U.S. economy foundered and unemployment soared. At the same time, illegal immigration from Latin The united states elevated dramatically as that region struggled using a massive debt crisis and several regional conflicts. By 1983, a single poll found that 90 percent of People favored immigration reform (Simpson 147).

To address this perceived crisis, Senator Alan Simpson (Republican from Wyoming) proposed a sweeping overhaul of America's immigration policy in 1984. In accordance with Simpson, illegal immigration posed several dangers for the American way of life: lowered wages and working conditions, employment displacement in the areas hardest hit (such as the Southwest), and prevalent disrespect for ones American legal system brought on by the overwhelming amount of people who broke the law to enter the country (Simpson 152-53).

It techniques employers must be careful in checking these kinds of documents and careful in filling out Form I-9. Maybe even careful adequate to participate during the INS' pilot method to examine identification documents by phone. Beyond that, you can find not many far more precautions an employer can take. The prevalence of very good counterfeit documents ways that some illegal aliens will slip in the cracks, but an employer can only do so significantly to ascertain the legitimacy of immigration documents.

However, an employer can not compel an employee to show the employee's social security card for immigration purposes, and creating so could result in a $1,000 fine under the IRCA. Yet the IRS requires an employer to see that card. What to do? Based on the Department of Justice, the employer have to dispense in the Type I-9 first. Once that may be complete, the employer can need the employee to show his or her social security card for purposes of the W-2 (Bednar 184-86).

So that begs the question: Why did Monson as well as the other fruit packers not encourage their workers to become U.S. citizens or legal aliens? Numerous were with Monson for more than 10 years, so they may have qualified for citizenship or permanent legal status. The costs of such a procedure would were minimal, specifically in light with the prices the company is paying now as it scrambles to hire workers. Moreover, if the organizations cannot hire more than enough workers, imagine the prices they will pay in rotted fruit and insufficient production. Regardless, it simply creates excellent firm sense to try to retain valued employees. That was the considering of the cafT owner in Bethesda, Maryland, who sponsored his long-time cook to be a U.S. citizen (Constable B1).

 

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.